11.2 Expenditure in LTP2 Period

11.2.1 The annual LTP funding for Greater Manchester consists of three main parts:

  • Integrated Transport Block (ITB): allocated as supported borrowing as a block for Greater Manchester, and apportioned amongst authorities by local agreement
  • Major schemes: allocated directly to the relevant authorities, as supported borrowing
  • Maintenance: allocated directly to highway authorities, as supported borrowing and direct grant

11.2.2 SEMMMS funding came as a discrete amount alongside the annual LTP settlement.  Government's contribution to the Transport Infrastructure Fund (GMtif) was also identified as a specific amount within the LTP settlement.  In addition, there were also some supplementary or emergency maintenance bids, or those associated with Primary Route Network or detrunking maintenance.

11.2.3 Government funding was often supported by other capital sources of funds, for example additional prudential borrowing by individual councils, European and regeneration grants, and funds from private developers.

11.2.4 Some supporting activities which are not suitable for capital funding, such as some routine maintenance, road safety educational and publicity work, and subsidised public transport services and fares, come from Authorities' revenue budgets.

Integrated Transport Block

11.2.5 The Greater Manchester authorities operated their own agreed formula to try and match resources to effective delivery  of the LTP strategy as described in paragraph 10.1.1.  This resulted in the following outcome:

  • 20% distributed to councils on the basis of road safety needs
  • 19% topsliced for Quality Bus Corridors
  • 35% allocated to GMPTA for other public transport schemes to improve congestion, accessibility and air quality throughout Greater Manchester
  • 26% allocated to councils to spend on other transport schemes to improve congestion, accessibility and air quality.

11.2.6 The table below shows Integrated Transport Block Funding allocated and spent over the first two years of the second Local Transport Plan period. Over this period, 97% of the Integrated Transport Block allocation has been spent by the Greater Manchester authorities. 

11.2.7 The table below compares allocations and spend by authority. Note that the figures include the resources each authority has had to implement QBC schemes. This was initially given en bloc to GMPTA and then subsequently redistributed to individual authorities according to the work programme. The figures also do not include the Greater Manchester transport infrastructure fund or SEMMMS.

11.2.8 When delivering capital projects, especially those requiring consultation and planning consents, or constrained by operational factors, it is often the case that spending is spread unevenly across years. The effect of this can be seen in the comparison between allocated and actual spend by GMPTE, which made a £5 million contribution to the Manchester Airport 3rd platform project across three financial years. Whilst this commitment was made some time ago, the final payments will not be made until after the completion of the project in December 2008,  representing a significant carry over between financial years.

Summary of ITB Spend in LTP2 Period (£k)
ITB 2006/7 2007/8 Total LTP2 Spend to Date

2008/09

Allocated
Authority   Allocated     Spent   Allocated     Spent Allocated Spent
Bolton 2138 1816 1774 2108 3912 3924 2244
Bury 1448 1805 2032 1739 3480 3544 1488
Manchester 4789 4948 4216 3965 9005 8913 4584
Oldham 2348 2860 1982 2431 4330 5291 1925
Rochdale 2192 1153 3013 5021 5205 6174 1797
Salford 2311 2156 2639 2847 4950 5003 2261
Stockport 2227 2697 2145 1635 4372 4332 2156
Tameside 2307 2732 1747 1672 4054 4404 1725
Trafford 1404 1808 1321 1321 2725 3129 1640
Wigan 1973 1466 1881 2573 3854 4039 2499
GMPTE 10373 7412 13370 10909 23743 18321 13577
Total 33510 30853 36120 36221 69630 67074 35846

11.2.9 The table overleaf shows the Greater Manchester spend by scheme type category over the 1st two years of the LTP2 period.  It also shows the spend for the financial year predicted at the start of the financial year for 2007/8 and for 2008/9.  The final column shows explanations of differences between predicted spend in 2007/8 and actual.  The Leigh Salford Manchester guided busway scheme is excluded, as work on this is being progressed through the Transport Innovation Fund. 

LTP Integrated Transport Block Spend by Scheme Category (£k)

Spend by Category

(£k)

2006/7 Spent

2007/8 Spent Total LTP2 to date 2007/8

Predicted

2008/9 Predicted Explanation of significant differences between 07/08 actual and predicted


Bus Priority

6524

7298

13822

5471

1998

Incorrect figure for predicted 2007/08; it was always intended to spend money on QBC programme


Guided Bus

238

158

396

500

180

Work on Leigh-Salford-Manchester scheme is being progressed through TIF


Bus Infrastructure

838

1006

1844

520

515

Spend on city centre bus facilities was predicted to be from other resources, but taken instead from minor works

Light Rail

53

6

59

0

3640

 

Interchange

3035

7089

10124

8173

5088

Carry over of expenditure: see para 11.2.8

Park and Ride

414

14

428

650

500

Slower than expected progress on schemes. Some, such as Lostock car park expansion, are now underway

Cycling

1696

2010

3706

2404

1660

 



Walking

2265

1666

3931

2964

1937

In a number of cases this was due to over-programming, or where schemes were delayed and reprogrammed for 2008/09.  Costs were lower than anticipated in a number of cases.  Bolton and Wigan used Transport Infrastructure Funds for walking schemes

Travel Plans

576

420

996

448

300

 

Safe Routes to School

606

312

918

405

787

A number of schemes were delivered through other funding sources, such as the Transport Infrastructure Fund.

In some cases schemes were deferred following review.

Local Safety Schemes

7402

7487

12189

8271

7347

 

Road Crossings

530

1706

2236

1140

1277

This increase in spend were as a result of a new scheme for pedestrian  facilities at a junction in Wigan, and an

increased allocation to address the BV165 indicator in Trafford.

Traffic Management

2197

3154

5351

3234

3291

 

Local Road Schemes

603

657

1260

617

219

 

Other Schemes

3876

3238

7114

3934

5810

 
Total

30853

36221

67074

38731

34369

 

SEMMMS

11.2.10 The table below shows the settlement received  by Stockport, Tameside and Manchester through the South East Manchester Multi-Modal Strategy. Details on how this money has been invested, together with future plans can be seen in the SEMMMS Progress Report 2006/07-2007/08.

 SEMMMS spend against allocation (£k)
Year      Allocated  Spent/Predicted
2006/7        6407 12544
2007/8 6765 7093
2008/9 6366 8304
Total 19538 27941

 

Transport Infrastructure Fund

11.2.12 The table below shows allocated compared to spend through the Greater Manchester transport infrastructure fund.  Half the money comes from central government and half through the PTE's central resources.  More information on how this money has been invested can be seen in the District Appendices of Bolton and Wigan.

Transport Infrastructure Fund Spend Against Allocation(£k)
Year      Allocated   Spent/Predicted
2006/7        7000 8394
2007/8 7000 7816
2008/9 7000 7434
Total 21000 23644

Maintenance

11.2.13 The table below shows the amount of money spent on maintenance compared to that allocated during 2006/7 and 2007/8.  This shows that across the county, additional funding was spent on maintenance.  This was in response to worsening road condition, and increasing focus on performance indicators.

Summary of Maintenance Spend in LTP2 Period bu Authority (£k)
 Maintenance  2006/7 2007/8 Total LTP2 Spend to Date

2008/09

Allocated
Authority Allocated Spent Allocated Spent Allocated Spent
Bolton 5205 4897 4490 3987 9565 8884 5769
Bury 2014 2487 1541 2570 3555 5057 2189
Manchester 5016 7372 3518 3885 8534 11257 4219
Oldham 5024 5281 2745 2502 7769 7783 2926
Rochdale 2292 2217 2843 3261 5135 5478 2137
Salford 1719 1817 2149 1848 3868 3665 2284
Stockport 1711 5981 6091 8138 9826 14079 2558
Tameside 1942 1961 2088 2218 7802 4311 2093
Trafford 1310 3398 1490 1490 2800 4888 1467
Wigan 2473 2524 1972 1971 4445 12299 2401
Total 28706 41169 28921 36532 57627 28043 36839


11.2.14 The table below shows how the Greater Manchester authorities spent their maintenance funds.

Summary of maintenance spend in LTP2 period by type (£k)
Maintenance 2006/7 Spent 2007/8 Spent Total LTP2 Spend to Date
Highway Maintenance 21203 13002 34205
Strengthening Schemes 6401 5522 11923
Structures Schemes 7526 10412 17940
Other Maintenance Schemes 2805 3720 6525
Total 37935 32656 70591

Additional Contributions

11.2.15 The implementation of LTP schemes was supplemented by a variety of other funds.  We obtained significant contributions through regeneration budgets such as ERDF, and through developer contributions.  The total capital spend on transport will be higher still because some schemes totally funded from other non-LTP sources are not included in this figure, some authorities have difficulty in separately recording the sources of funds, and it can also be difficult to categorise certain schemes.

 Additional Contributions (£k)
Year Other budgets

administered by Authorities

Private / developer Other grants / sources
2006/7 5535 311 5529
2007/8 3724 196 12426