Cross-boundary issues
Fig 4.11 shows the number of journeys to work across Greater Manchester's boundaries.
Contacts and discussions with adjoining local transport authorities have identified the following transportation issues that will need to be addressed during the LTP2 period:
|
Authority |
Issue |
Action to resolve |
|---|---|---|
|
Blackburn with Darwen |
Peak hour commuting effects on A666 and capacity on
|
Address by Blackburn-Bolton-Manchester Corridor Partnership. Examination of potential for increased train capacity with Northern
|
|
Merseyside LTP authorities |
Capacity of Manchester Rail Hub |
Also a Greater Manchester countywide issue. Major investment to resolve it seems unlikely to be forthcoming within the LTP2 period, despite the clear case for it, but opportunities may exist to recast services in ways which create more capacity and serve proposed land use patterns in the sub-regional strategy. Needs better definition of problem and investigation by a regional body given its likely importance in the RSS |
| M62 traffic levels | M62 Route Action Study under way by
|
|
| Improved public transport access from Greater Manchester to Liverpool John Lennon Airport | Potential interchange between Manchester trains and airport bus links at Liverpool South Parkway interchange (currently under
construction), subject to
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parkside Intermodal
|
Need to ensure good public transport access and that general traffic is routed on the motorway. Discussions with developers and promoters. | |
| Headbolt Lane (Kirkby) electrification scheme offers potential of low cost extension to
|
Investigation of recovery of superseded electrical equipment from SE England | |
|
Warrington |
Capacity of Manchester Rail Hub(see above) |
See above |
| Strategic
|
A study is needed at a regional level to consider the cross-boundary effects.
|
|
| Weak
|
Ongoing discussions with
|
|
| Omega development proposal | Should the development go ahead at the scale planned, there is a need to ensure that the scale of highway impacts and public
transport access needs is recognised as wider than the Warrington LTP area and that the developer(s) provides the necessary
level of funding. For example, the current proposed public transport framework does not include and infrastructure in Greater
Manchester, yet there be a need for improvments to local bus services to
|
|
|
|
Preston-Chorley- Greater Manchester
|
Corridor in forthcoming review of Northern franchise and preparation of RUS. May need consideration of additional rolling stock and platform lengthening issues. |
| M61 Corridor capacity management | Highways Agency network management and proposed HOV lane. Needs relating to park and ride strategy. | |
| Local train services Preston-
|
See above | |
| Further
|
At initial proposals stage | |
|
|
Community
|
|
| Improved
|
See Blackburn with Darwen |
|
| Improve attractiveness of express bus services from East Lancashire to Greater Manchester | Operator investment in quality vehicles to be maintained and delay points addressed. Study with Lancashire CC, Blackburn with Darwen Council and Highways Agency ongoing to assess potential highway improvements to assist bus operations. | |
|
|
See Merseyside | |
|
|
SEMMMS proposals |
Funding has now been separately identified for SEMMMS minor works proposals in the last local transport settlement. As regards the SEMMMS Relief Road major scheme ,it has been placed in the top quartile of regional priorities ,and the SEMMMS area authorities and Cheshire will need to progress the case for PFI funding to supplement that already identified in the RFA |
|
Smartcard/Cheshire Travelcard interface – possible extension of latter into SE Greater Manchester |
Cheshire/GMPTE discussions |
|
|
Alderley Edge bypass effects on Greater Manchester. (Improved access to Astra Zeneca employment opportunities, but potential increased inward car commuting) Linked to SEMMMS programme |
Scheme appears in top quartile of RFA prioritisation, and is therefore likely to be constructed subject to resources. Effects on Greater Manchester roads would need to be kept under review with regard to the desirability of modal shift |
|
|
Public transport access to Manchester Airport from Cheshire, and to Greater Manchester as part of the City Region Sub-Regional Statement |
Development of schemes eg Crewe gateway and further promotion of travel plan activities. Provision of third platform at Manchester
Airport
Consideration of how transport improvements in Cheshire could feed into and support the Greater Manchester Integrated Transport Corridors |
|
|
|
Traffic impact , speed and safety for both motorised and non-motorised users. Travel behaviour. Better
Improved local and long distance bus/coach services Standard of the A57/A628/A616 core trunk road across the National Park |
See separate South Pennines Integrated Transport Strategy (
Continued joint working of SEMMMS authorities |
|
West Yorkshire LTP authorities |
Cross boundary
|
|
| Lack of rolling stock capacity | Joint PTE solution required owing to absence of funding from Northern
|
|
| Trans- Pennine route capacity, to assist Manchester-Leeds access as part of Northern Way strategy | No prospect of major funding. Northern Way transport budget may assist. Platform extensions study on Todmorden - Manchester route. | |
| Loading gauge restriction for containers | Maintain pressure for loading gauge enhancement to accommodate 9'6" high containers | |
| South Yorkshire LTP authorities | Access between Manchester and Sheffield core cities in context of Northern way initiative | Advocacy to improve South
|

