Achieving Desired Outcomes by Tackling Shared Priorities

This section outlines how we will seek to achieve our desired outcomes under the headings of the shared priorities agreed with Government. We do this by showing how the LTP component strategies will be used in this process, and what we intend to have achieved by the end of the LTP period.

Managing Congestion

In LTP1 our approach to demand management was to focus on measures which encouraged modal switch and improved alternatives to the private car. In the case of Quality Bus Corridors and cycle routes these also involved the reallocation of roadspace away from the car.

Over the period of LTP2, we shall continue the integrated approach commenced in GMLTP1 that provides incentives to use public transport, and discourages the use of private cars in the peak period. We shall focus on trying to ensure that congestion does not worsen as a result of our plans for economic growth; any reduction secured will be regarded as a bonus.

We are looking at various options for managing demand as part of our TIF pump-priming work to develop a 'toolkit' of demand management measures that will support sustainable economic growth. These will be coupled with development of an investment programme for public transport combined with investigation of techniques to achieve the behavioural change necessary.

Actions for Public Transport

Metrolink

The expansion of Metrolink is central to our strategy of achieving modal shift, particularly for journeys to the Regional Centre

By the end of the LTP2 period, as part of the Phase 1/2 renewal approved scheme, we shall have

  • introduced additional trams, to relieve overcrowding and to maximise the benefits from additional car parking currently being introduced
  • improved stops in terms of lighting, accessibility and new ticket machines
  • renewal of track to improve ride quality and reduce noise

We will continue to work closely with DfT to identify a way of procuring the full Phase 3 expansion which is central to our longer-term strategy: namely the lines to Oldham-Rochdale, Ashton-under-Lyne and Manchester Airport. In future we also aim to develop Metrolink to Stockport and, subject to availability of private funding, to Trafford Park.

Bus

Through our bus strategy we aim to provide the following during LTP2 in order to achieve modal shift and so combat congestion:

  • continuation of the Integrate Project which since 1998 has consistently brought all partners together to deliver service improvements.
  • a focus on improving service reliability, vehicle quality, and integration of services, modes and fares to develop a bus network to support the sustainable and inclusive growth of Greater Manchester. These will be delivered through partnership with bus operators (see the GMITS bus operator concordat overleaf), using mechanisms such as Corridor Partnerships and, through these, Statutory Quality Partnership schemes.
  • completion of the current QBC programme, involving a package of measures including bus priority and improved waiting facilities, on radial routes to the Regional Centre and in the Northern Orbital, SEMMMS and JETTS corridors
  • more Yellow School Buses to reduce car usage on the school run
  • detailed appraisal of future bus park and ride facilities and work to implement facilities where these provide value for money and complement our overall strategy
  • other specific measures, detailed in the Bus Strategy, including improvements to waiting facilities, ticketing (including Smartcards) and information (including the continued roll-out of RTPI)

Policy

GMITS
Bus Operator Concordat

The Greater Manchester Authorities and GMBOA recognise the role that bus services will play in the development and implementation of the Greater Manchester Integrated Transport Strategy.  They have agreed this Concordat to set out the principles on which they will work together to deliver the bus network that will be required under the Strategy.

The Authorities welcome the active participation of GMBOA members in the development and implementation of the Strategy and the Strategic Corridor Partnerships.

GMBOA supports the principles of the Integrated Transport Strategy covering all transport modes, public and private, and through its members will participate in the Strategic Corridor Partnerships.

The Authorities and GMBOA recognise that to deliver the modal shift required by the Strategy will require a significant increase in the level, quality and reliability of bus services and will work in both the Corridor Partnerships and the Integration Project to deliver this to complement demand restraint measures.

GMBOA members will work with the Passenger Transport Authority, individual district councils and other key partners to agree and deliver transport and regeneration outcome based targets in individual corridors. It is anticipated that statutory quality partnerships will be developed, on a corridor basis, as an important mechanism for delivering those elements of the corridor agreements relating to bus services.       

GMBOA will continue to work with GMPTE to deliver, at countywide level, the objectives set out in the County-Wide Quality Partnership Agreement including:

Improvements to information for passengers and potential passengers

Integration of ticketing

Improvements to reliability and bus journey times

Raising vehicle quality

Improvements to waiting facilities and interchange.

Rail

Our approach during LTP2 will be to enhance local facilities in line with the Greater Manchester Railplan. These measures will  focus on improving information, accessibility, safety, security and car parking. We will also direct other investment to improve the station environs in accordance with the Railplan's Station Development Zone(SDZ) concept. iResearch shows that the majority of a station's catchment patronage comes from within 800 to 1000 metres of the station. A fully accessible, safe and secure station with good facilities will not achieve its potential if access routes, especially close to the station, are inaccessible or dangerous. In SDZs, authorities will develop co-ordinated proposals to better link stations and the areas they serve, identifying improvements to local roads (including pedestrian crossings), walking and cycling routes, car parking, local signage, information boards and landscaping.  In this way, we believe that more people will be encouraged to use local stations.

We will also work with the rail industry to increase capacity by identifying funding mechanisms which will enable delivery of:

  • additional rolling stock to alleviate overcrowding on services
  • additional platforms at existing stations (e.g. Salford Central, Salford Crescent and Manchester Airport)
  • new stations (e.g. Golborne). 
  • schemes for the possible future conversion of other routes to tram-train technology.
  • new station car parks, and extensions to existing ones where further park and ride trips can be encouraged.

We intend  to make a major input to the forthcoming review of the Northern Rail Franchise.  We are aware that a number of stations in Greater Manchester are under-utilised, and we shall review their future. However, it is essential that any revisions to the rail network have clear advantages overall (eg in terms of allowing the improvement of other parts of the rail network or the local bus network) so that the number of current and future passengers benefiting exceeds those who are inconvenienced. Furthermore, we will ensure that any proposals deliver improved value for money.  Any review must take into account  future demand generated by new residential or commercial development, especially in relation to sub-regional and City Region strategies.

Coaches

Coaches need facilities for picking up and setting down passengers at venues so that congestion is avoided, and pedestrian movement takes place safely. In addition, safe parking areas are required.

We shall continue to implement and monitor the Coach Parking Strategy for the Regional Centre, which has been devised in partnership with coach operators and major venue operators. This will be done by a Coach Parking Liaison Group for Manchester and Salford. Coach parking / drop off will also be considered by other authorities across the conurbation as part of Sustainable Tourism initiatives which also encourage visitors to walk / cycle to attractions.

Taxis

Hackney and private hire cabs provide an alternative to the private car, and play a role in reducing congestion by providing the final ‘leg’ of a public transport journey or a ‘backup mode’ should a connection be missed.

We shall continue to fund a taxi home for travellers at some bus stations when their last bus has failed. We will support their continued presence at transport interchanges and in other convenient and safe locations.

Our ten Licensing Authorities have reviewed the number of licences they issue by undertaking surveys of unmet demand. As a result, eight authorities currently follow a policy of restricting the issue of plates. Bolton has no restrictions, and Manchester has a policy of controlled expansion. Circumstances do vary between Districts and therefore a single approach across the county may not be appropriate. The number of licences will be kept under review.  In Manchester, Bolton and Wigan, the Nightbus services will continue to supplement taxis in serving the weekend night-time economy.

We are developing a Taxi Strategy to improve their integration with other modes. GMPTE will maintain their training guide for taxi drivers, particularly incorporating diversity and disability awareness, in conjunction with Local Authority licensing officers.

Integration

We shall continue to promote increased integration between transport modes, as we want our transport systems to offer a more comprehensive network and as seamless a journey as possible when being assessed against the private car alternative. In the deregulated and privately-operated public transport system, we shall work with our partners to achieve this, building on the successes we have delivered through the Integrate project.

  • Through our Corridor Partnerships, we aim to ensure that different public transport modes complement rather than compete with each other.
  • We will continue our work to improve physical integration (eg by providing car and cycle parking at interchanges, encouraging the development of feeder services), building on the work we have already done to provide information about connecting modes at interchanges.
  • We will work with operators to simplify tickets and fares structures across the board, whilst at the same time examining the case for specialist tickets such as City Centre Visitor Card or a “carnet” type card that could give the benefit of discounted fares to occasional users. 
  • We will continue to develop park & ride schemes for rail stations and Metrolink stops, and will also consider bus-based schemes where these conform with our wider objectives.

Actions for Cycling

In LTP2, we aim to facilitate trips to local centres, schools and key employment locations. We aim to deliver and promote  a safe cycle network in order to encourage those people who have been considering but not yet undertaking short cycle journeys,  to switch from  habitual use of the car.

During the next five years, we shall take the following steps to improve cycling:

  • Invest in better cycling facilities, targeted at busy centres, schools and major businesses, in areas most likely to attract cycle use.
  • Focus promotion on increasing levels of cycling at selected locations where infrastructure has been improved, to be verified by automatic cycle counters
  • Focus resources on areas with the greatest potential to increase cycle usage. In 2005/06, Manchester will invest £100,000 in improving conditions for cyclists on the Oxford Road/HEP corridor.
  • Publish a new Greater Manchester cycle map to complement a bi-annual 'On Yer Bike in Greater Manchester'  magazine and a Districts' cycling website (www.cyclegm.org)
  • Delivery of improved school cycle training  and establishing adult cycle training - the latter inline with the recommendations of a study to be commissioned
  • Substantially complete the National Cycle Network within Greater Manchester, as described in Figure 5.1 (N.B. changes to the route network can be expected as the project develops)
  • Update the Concise Pedestrian and Cycle Audit document ( COPECAT),ii informed by experience of its utilisation to date
  • Incorporate cycle facilities into authorities' Transport Asset Management Plans (TAMPs)
  • Share good practice, with effective dissemination around the Districts via the LTP Cycle Group, ensuring that we adopt the latest techniques and measures

Through these measures, we aim to achieve the LTP2 indicator for cycle flows across a range of monitored sites on main and unclassified roads and on off-road routes.

 

Actions for Walking

To increase the proportion of short trips made on foot, the Greater Manchester Walking Strategy's Action Plan targets the following types of trip:

  • School trips
  • Other education trips
  • Trips to both leisure and shopping destinations
  • Commuter trips
  • Trips to public transport

These are ranked in order of potential for growth with trips to schools showing the most likely area for growth. A major focus over the next Plan period will be on school trips as the car accounts for 35% of school journeys and there is a considerable potential for a modal shift to walking.

During the next five years, we shall take the following steps to improve walking:

  • Create and promote  travel plans for business and educational sites
  • Encourage training such as kerbcraft in schools to encourage greater levels of walking amongst younger people
  • Implement engineering measures e.g. improved lighting, crossing points, surfacing, and the removal of other obstructions to walking to increase the attractiveness of walking as a mode of transport.
  • establish more direct and safe routes for pedestrians, provide safe and convenient crossing points on key routes , and reduce speeds

Through these measures we aim to meet the target for indicators LTP 10e and 114

 
 
 

LTP2 Cycle Investment Priorities

 

Smarter Choices

The Greater Manchester authorities will continue to build on the foundations laid during our first LTP for the next five years:

  • We will employ School Travel Advisers to meet the DfT Travel To School Initiative target of every school having a school travel plan in place by 2010.  To date, 207 of our 1161 schools have been assisted in producing a STP.
  • We will continue to encourage and support employers to develop workplace travel plans where we feel that this will have the most impact on local traffic.
  • Where appropriate, we will encourage developers to implement residential travel plans, and are revising our Supplementary Planning Document on travel plans to reflect this.
  • GMPTE will continue to work on providing bespoke public transport information to support employers implementing travel plans and hospitals, through timetable provision and, where possible, personalised journey advice.
  • We will continue to promote car sharing, through use of our rebranded car sharing website www.carsharegm.com
  • We will continue to support travel awareness campaigns such as In Town Without My Car and BikeWeek.
  • Additionally, opportunities to implement other Smarter Choices measures will be seized upon.  For example, Manchester City Council is at an advanced stage in procuring a car club, providing access to a car for city centre residents.  The car club is expected to deliver modal shift and reduce congestion.

Continuing efforts will be made to secure funding and commitments for these measures through the planning system, using section 106 agreements which we trust will still be available for this purpose.  We have some concerns over our ability to do this if proposals contained in the recent Government consultation document on planning gain support are implemented.

In addition to continuing the work begun in our first LTP, we also are seeking to bring about a step change in this area of work, through implementation of the Travel Behaviour Change Strategy that forms part of the GMITS.

Research conducted by Sustrans and Socialdata on our behalf shows that implementing this strategy could being about a reduction in car use of up to 15% in the four priority corridors and increase public transport patronage by 17% between 2008 and 2020.  However, a work programme on this scale is unprecedented and will only be achieved through a successful Transport Innovation Fund bid.

Development Planning and Parking Policy

We are working to ensure that Regional Spatial Strategy continues the emphasis established in the Unitary Development Plans developed during the period of LTP1. These sought to steer significant traffic generating development to locations which are highly accessible by public transport, and will be incorporated in the new Local Development Frameworks which will be developed over the LTP2 period.

We shall work to ensure that a higher percentage of newly-approved developments are in locations with good public transport access and that appropriate parking standards are applied (a copy of the Greater Manchester Parking Standards can be found in the Annexe.....)The aim is to ensure these tie in with our accessibility and congestion targets.

We shall continue to ensure that short stay parkers currently receive priority in terms of pricing and provision in order to sustain the economy of our town centres. We will work to reduce long-term provision and increase its cost over LTP2, particularly where investment has been made in public transport.

Freight

Local authorities, with the assistance of the Freight Quality Partnership, will take actions on freight that will assist in a more economically prosperous Greater Manchester. 

Congestion Related Activities that will be progressed;

  • Possible use of some bus lanes at certain times, or HGV-only lanes
  • Route network signing for freight
  • Examination of delivery restrictions
  • Using Decriminalised Enforcement powers to protect loading areas from illegal parking
  • Investing in and encouraging freight  modal switch

Powered Two Wheelers (PTWs)

These vehicles are relatively economical in their use of road space. However, their accident rate is high thus conflicting with the road safety shared priority. We will continue our objective of improving their safety on the road by assessing all road markings for skid hazards, especially on bends and installing anti-skid markings where necessary and providing adequate and secure stands for their parking requirements. The Greater Manchester authorities will analyse the research that has taken place into allowing Powered Two Wheelers into bus lanes in British Cities and in Dublin. We will develop a PTW strategy to develop these themes further.

Statement

GMPTE advice on travel plans

PPG 13 recommends that Travel Plans should be submitted alongside planning applications that are likely to have significant transport implications. A Travel Plan is considered to be a useful tool to help deliver ‘sustainable transport objectives’ and the production of Travel Plans is therefore a key element of  LTP strategy. Guidance produced by the AGMA Travel Co-ordinator (ref: Best Practice Model -Supplementary Planning Guidance) sets down the thresholds, based on PPG13, which should trigger the request for a Travel Plan alongside a planning application.

In responding to consultations on planning applications, GMPTE will check to see if a Travel Plan is required in accordance with the AGMA guidance and will request the submission of a Travel Plan if one has not already been submitted. GMPTE also advises on the types of measures it would like to see included in a Travel Plan such as improvements to, and promotion of public transport e.g. additional services and stops, better access to information, discounted tickets, promotional campaigns. This area of work is expanding owing  to the scale of new development taking place in Greater Manchester and the potential traffic impact, which means that the 'softer' measures are becoming more essential in order to encourage the use of public transport.

GMPTE has also used Neighbourhood Renewal Funding to provide personalised travel advice for job seekers.  Travel Advisers have been placed in Job Centres in Newton Heath and Wythenshawe, offering advice on routes, timetables and ticketing, with the aim of making new jobs accessible to people that were previously unaware that they could get to them.  In addition to cutting car use, this has helped to address the Accessibility shared priority. GMPTE is bidding to continue this work.

Additionally, workers at Job Centres have been trained in the use of the GMPTE internet journey planner, so that they can offer similar advice to job seekers.  Travel Shop Assistants also attend job fayres to offer advice to those seeking new employment.

Greater Manchester's Approach to the Traffic Management Act

Effectively managing the highway network to keep all modes of transport moving safely contributes to reducing congestion and casualties and improving accessibility and air quality. The LTP Technical Annex provides details of progress of individual authorities in Greater Manchester.

Coordination arrangements have been introduced in Greater Manchester so that the highway authorities, Passenger Transport Authority (on behalf of the public transport operators), the police (on behalf of the emergency services), freight association and utilities work together to maximise the traffic management benefit for all parties.Ten Traffic Managers have been appointed, and they meet on a sub-regional basis.

The Highways Agency, ten Greater Manchester local authorities and one neighbouring unitary authority have collectively agreed a key highway network for the sub region, which includes main roads, distributor roads with over 10,000 vehicles/day, high usage bus routes, on-street tram routes and access to local centres including hospitals and industrial estates.

Cycling and pedestrian routes to local centres have been identified and their conflicts with the priority road traffic network are being considered.  Where appropriate, pedestrian crossing points of pedestrian routes to key centres are being given an increased share of the available highway capacity to create safe walking routes.

Two aspects of traffic management activity are being coordinated across the conurbation:

  • regular congestion or delays because of inadequate capacity, and
  • disruption due to events, incidents, or temporary works. 

Identification of congestion hotspots in a systematic way is planned utilising the ITIS data supplied by DfT.  As an interim measure bus delay data from bus operators and moving observer data on radial routes is being utilised to identify hotspots for further investigation.  Actions currently being undertaken include changes to signal junction timing and targeted enforcement of parking offences.  Actions planned include reviews of parking and loading arrangements on radial routes and improving pedestrian and cycling access to local centres.  In the longer term, reviews of the highway capacity at hotspots identified by the ITIS data and the provision of better information to the travelling public are proposed.

Disruption has been identified by a Greater Manchester study into the causes of bus service unreliability as a minor proportion of the overall delay to bus services.  Congestion, due to limited highway capacity, and the dwell time at bus stops were identified as the major delaying factors.  Although the actual delay as a proportion of all journeys is minor, the impact is significant as the disruption delays are a variation to the normal or anticipated journey times.

More timely information to public transport operators and the travelling public is proposed.  This requires a more rigorous approach to the coordination of highway authority, utility and developers' works on or immediately adjacent the highway.  A conurbation wide roadworks on-line information project has been completed and is currently being rolled out across the sub region.  Essentially the project shares road and street works information, edited by local highway authorities to identify disruption to the key highway network, with other users such as Greater Manchester Fire Service and the Passenger Transport Executive.  It is proposed to make this more widely available to transport operators and the travelling public.

Consideration of the benefits of a permit system to better coordinate road and street works is currently underway and it is anticipated that a permit system which gives more attention to works affecting the key highway network would be beneficial and consistent with the Greater Manchester approach to traffic management.

Cooperation between the emergency services, led by Greater Manchester Police, and the local highway authorities on responses to incidents such as road traffic collisions is already operating well.  It is proposed to improve the dissemination of information by extending the current media arrangement for strategic routes to the recently developed key highway network.

Events such as football matches, and pop concerts can have a significant disruptive effect on journeys on both public and private transport in a significant area around the venues of the event.  Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive is coordinating the identification of events likely to affect the key highway and public transport networks and local highway authorities are coordinating the development of management plans for each event.

Whilst Greater Manchester Police have confirmed that congestion is not a national policing priority, they are fully involved in helping to prepare the management plans for events and in deploying resources to assist in managing the congestion. Event organisers have generally welcomed the proactive approach of local authorities, the Police and the Passenger Transport Executive.

Within the five year LTP2 period it is anticipated that the corridor partnership work of the Greater Manchester Integrated Transport Strategy will lead to better coordination of mass transit movements with regeneration activity, and the management of congestion and disruption on corridors will involve a wider partnership than is currently the case.

Smarter Travel options will be developed involving the coordination of real time travel information across the conurbation and the dissemination of this via on-street displays and personal messages by text and computer in addition to improvements to the quality of information on local radio, television, and in local newspapers.

Camera enforcement of parking and moving traffic offences is seen as a positive way to manage congestion hotspots across Greater Manchester.  Preparations to support such initiatives are currently underway along with bids for the recently introduced bus lane enforcement powers.  Liaison between local authorities, the Highways Agency and the Police are in hand to ensure that a coordinated approach to each transport corridor can be supported.

Statement

Bolton Town Centre Study

Churchgate, Bolton Town Centre

Introduction

Bolton is a key centre for one of the larger metropolitan boroughs, and lies in the north west of the conurbation. It is an important retail and employment centre, and pioneered town centre pedestrianisation in Greater Manchester.  These traffic-free areas have been enhanced and extended over the years, but the popularity of the centre means that there are still issues to be addressed in order to maintain and increase its attractiveness.

Current Problems and Issues

  • Poor bus circulation and reliability due to congestion
  • Congestion on main roads into the centre, especially in the north-east quadrant
  • Poor interchange between bus services and rail services
  • Poor linkages between arrival points (bus station, rail station and car parks) and town centre attractions / facilities
  • Incoherent cycling and walking network
  • Rat-running in peak period resulting in congestion

Proposed approach

Development of a major scheme bid (identified as a regional priority for RFA) for a new bus and rail interchange, with the introduction of a bus gyratory system in the town centre and contra-flow traffic lanes, will improve modal interchange and town centre traffic circulation. Junction improvements on the highway box to improve bus flow between the QBCs and bus gyratory system will also improve traffic flow, in particular for buses. The public realm will be improved by redesigning the layout of main town centre streets, including upgraded pedestrian and cycle routes through the centre. Car parking will be rationalised and managed to improve accessibility and manage demand. Servicing arrangements for commercial properties will also be improved.

Funding Sources

A major scheme bid is included in  LTP2 to develop a new interchange and improve pedestrian, cycling and bus movement within the town centre. Additional  funding will support the work, including Transport Infrastructure Funding, PTA Capital Programme and Developer Contributions.

Targets and Objectives Met

Main LTP targets addressed include LTP1 accessibility, LTP2,6 and 12a traffic flows and modal split, LTP3 and 11 cycling and walking, and LTP8 and 9 air quality and climate change.

Statement

Routes to Ashton-under-Lyne

Introduction

Ashton-under-Lyne is a key centre in the east of the conurbation. It is an important retail focus, and there are plans for a major extension to its Arcades shopping centre. Areas to the west of the town centre have been the subject of an extensive  regeneration exercise, and close by is the A635 intersection with the M60 Manchester Outer Ring Road , which has significantly increased the accessibility of Ashton and also been instrumental in the development of a large strategic site at Ashton Moss, adjacent to the town centre.

Routes to Ashton - under - Lyne include A6017 Ashton-Denton, A670 Ashton-Mossley, A627 Ashton-Dukinfield, A635  Ashton -Stalybridge and A635 Ashton-Audenshaw.

Current Problems and Issues

  • Severe and increasing congestion is being experienced on the routes into and out of Ashton town centre, in particular to Manchester,Mossley,  Denton, Hyde and Stalybridge.
  • Poor accessibility by cycle is currently being experienced along these routes from Ashton town centre to the other local centres within Tameside, such as Denton and Hyde, as well as poor accessibility by cycle to  Ashton town centre from the nearby residential areas.
  • There is also poor pedestrian access to the public transport interchanges, particularly railway stations, from the surrounding residential areas which is currently inhibiting the role public transport can play by encouraging modal shift and reducing congestion.

Proposed approach

In order to resolve these problems and issues the following schemes will be pursued in the LTP2 period:

  • provision of on road cycle facilities between Ashton and Denton. The cycle flow between Ashton and Denton is currently the highest in Tameside, but on-road cycle facilities are presently only provided on A6017 Guide Lane between Guide Bridge and Audenshaw. Additional on-road cycle facilities are currently being provided along A6017 Stockport Road between Ashton and Guide Bridge. It is proposed to complete the on-road cycle facilities on the remainder of the route between Ashton and Denton in 2006/07. This scheme will  help to reduce the high numbers of short trips which are currently undertaken by car and to improve the poor accessibility by cycle into Ashton.
  • upgraded pedestrian routes to interchanges, particularly rail stations. Many of the pedestrian routes which provide access from the surrounding residential areas to the public transport interchanges, especially the rail stations, are currently poorly used for this purpose. It  is proposed to undertake a programme of improvements, including direction signing,  lighting, and  footways, in order to facilitate such use.
  • provision of real-time public transport information for the A635 Manchester-Ashton-Stalybridge. QBC.
  • linking Ashton and Denton SCOOT systems. Ashton town centre has an extensive SCOOT system which is currently being extended to incorporate the Ashton Northern Bypass Stage 1, and  A635 Manchester Road between Ashton and Audenshaw, including the junctions accessing the M60. A SCOOT system is currently being provided along  A57 Manchester Road and A6017 Ashton Road in Denton. This proposal will link these two separate SCOOT systems along the A6017 between Ashton and Denton thereby reducing congestion and journey times on this important route.     
  • extension of SCOOT along the A670 from Ashton town centre to Fountain Street, and from A627 Ashton town centre to Chapel St., Dukinfield. These two proposals will extend the existing Ashton SCOOT system along two of the main routes from Ashton, thereby helping to reduce congestion and improve journey times on these important routes to Mossley and Hyde. These two routes also form parts of the Rochdale  - Oldham  - Ashton - Hyde QBC  and  the Manchester - Ashton - Stalybridge QBC and the extension of the SCOOT system will additionally help buses.
  • completion of Manchester-Ashton-Stalybridge QBC, including provision of traffic signals at A670 Mossley Rd / Beaufort Rd junction. This QBC forms one of the main east-west public transport corridors crossing Tameside, linking Manchester, Ashton and Stalybridge. Proposals on this QBC include schemes that will reduce delays to buses, including both bus lanes and priority at signals, in order to encourage modal shift. Proposals for the introduction of bus lanes on B6390 Audenshaw Road, Audenshaw are currently being developed and  proposals for bus lanes and traffic signal improvements on A635 Stamford Street between Ashton and Stalybridge are under investigation. The  A670 Mossley Rd / Beaufort Rd junction is a group of complex priority junctions which delay buses on this QBC. The provision of traffic signals and SCOOT at this junction will  assist in alleviating these problems.
  • investigation into, and subsequent improvement of, off-road cycle routes along the Peak Forest Canal to Hyde, and along the disused railway to Oldham. These proposals will form a major north - south off-road cycle route across Tameside, linking Oldham with Ashton and Hyde. The investigation and subsequent improvements will be undertaken in conjunction with Sustrans.
  • improvements to cycle routes and signing to Ashton from the residential areas to the south, south-west and east. These proposals will form a safe network of cycle routes into Ashton town centre from the adjacent residential areas in order to reduce the high numbers of short trips which are currently undertaken by car, and to improve the poor accessibility by cycle into Ashton.
  • secure cycle parking in the town centre. Cycle parking facilities have already been provided at a number of locations across Ashton town centre.  It is proposed to provide additional secure cycle parking facilities at locations across the town centre to encourage more trips to the town centre to be made by cycle.  

Funding Sources

Funding will come primarily  from the LTP Integrated Transport Block. There is potential for joint working with GMPTE on public transport schemes, and GM UTC regarding SCOOT. Some developer contributions may be forthcoming.

Targets and Objectives Met

The schemes will directly and significantly contribute to BV102, LTP1, LTP3, LTP6, LTP9, LTP11 and LTP12b.

 

Statement

Shawclough Primary School, Rochdale

Bike to School Day, Shawclough

Walking to Shawclough Primary School

Introduction

Shawclough Primary School is located some 2kms north west of Rochdale Town Centre. It has nearly 450 pupils, and part of its catchment covers an area of above-average car ownership.

Problems and Issues

The car-borne school run causes significant localised congestion, and reduces the amount of physical activity undertaken by children.

There are a number of problems with the pedestrian and cycle network, including a lack of continuity of off-road and urban links, and constraints imposed by the hill and valley terrain on which ribbon development took place as the town grew. Justification for further provision of off-road links is hampered by the low numbers of existing cyclists.

Further issues compounding the problem include lack of or poor facilities for walking and cycling, indiscriminate parking by parents leading to complaints from local residents, frustration of a latent desire of the pupils to use their bikes and the natural concerns from parents regarding safety issues.

Proposed approach

Techniques addressing the whole of the school journey have been used in the Shawclough scheme, involving implementation of improvements to infrastructure particularly links to off road routes, an education process with schools and pupils, and then follow up works to widen the sphere of influence of the initiative. Along with other schools, they took advantage of a cycle parking grant to create 36 cycle parking bays. Working with Sustrans, the school became a 'Bike It' pilot school -which involved cycle training incorporating promotional cycle rides, cycle maintenance classes, and a Bike on Wednesday incentive scheme. Physical works included a widened surfaced track linking into a disused railway route being developed as NCN 92. This improved both the cycling and walking route  from adjacent estates to the school and to the wider network.  This is part of our network initiative for the area which has been branded as BikeEDlinks.

The intention now is to build on this work by introducing further improvements. The school travel plan will be formalised this year. Further work to sign the network is ongoing, and  an old pelican crossing on Whitworth Road will be upgraded to a toucan. Follow up work from the sustainability team, including the travel coordinator, remains an essential ingredient  to ensure that the long term improvements  continue, using the foundations described above.

Funding Sources

Infrastructure: Sustrans £17k, LTP £22k

Council revenue funding for Walking to School training

NRF, Fairshares Lottery fund and Sustrans £5.5k, for cyclist training courses and Bike It staff time on promotion, bike maintenance classes, ride leading, surveys & curriculum links.

A crucial factor in this process has been the funding of travel planning by schools, LTP and the Council.

Targets and Objectives Met

Up to 45 children (10% of pupils) now cycle to school on Wednesdays and approximately 10 - 15 on other days of the week. This contributes in particular to the achievements of targets LTP3 Cycling, LTP4 Mode of Travel to School, and LTP11 Walking.

Following this work with Sustrans, and their recognition that the authority is delivering, it has been possible to gain additional capital funding (£100k for the NCN 92 route). This will extend NCN 92, through the addition of toucan crossings across two classified A roads, linking in with the second phase pathfinder Wardleworth Homezone and an upgrading of the river valley route for a further 3km. This puts the formal link between the Whitworth /Rochdale Route NCN 92, the Littleborough Rochdale Route NCN 80 and the Calderdale, Rochdale, Oldham, Manchester NCN 66 on a practical footing.  A further boost to the network will come with the jointly funded LTP and ERDF scheme to improve this route in the area of the Kingsway business park over the next 2 years. This work will benefit six other schools, although constraints on available revenue funding may reduce the potential for such a comprehensive approach, which could limit the effectiveness of the programme.

Statement

The Greater Manchester Motorway Network

M60 motorway

Introduction

The Highways Agency is responsible for the management, operation, maintenance and improvement of the motorway and trunk road network. These are roads that are of national importance.

In Greater Manchester this network comprises the M60 Manchester Outer Ring Road, the M62 Trans-Pennine Motorway and motorways which link Greater Manchester to the national network - M56  , M61, M66, M67, and M602. In addition, part of the M6 national route passes through Greater Manchester in the Wigan area. . The network also includes a Principal Road Motorway - A627(M)- and some all-purpose roads - A57(T), A628(T) and A663(T).

Current Problems and Issues

  • Congestion causing journey times to be unreliable. An estimated 35% of delays on the network are due to incidents such as road traffic accidents and roadworks.
  • Road safety problems
  • Environmental issues such as poor air quality around the motorway network
  • Need for maintenance of carriageways and structures

Proposed approach

  • Works to widen the M60 between Junctions 5 and 8 are due to finish in Spring 2006
  • Progress the by-pass of the villages of Mottram, Hollingworth and Tintwistle:it is anticipated that a Public Inquiry will be needed and will be held during Autumn 2006. If it is decided that the scheme should proceed, and necessary funds continue to be available, the earliest date the new road could open is Autumn 2009.
  • Improve the planning and management of roadworks
  • Highways Agency Traffic Officers have recently taken over responsibility from the police for patrolling the motorway network in Greater Manchester and dealing with incidents
  • Trial of a system to manage the flow of vehicles joining at motorway junctions. The system, also known as “ramp metering”, uses traffic signals located on a motorway slip road to control the amount of traffic joining the motorway during periods of congestion on the motorway. The sites are M62 J19 and M60 J2.
  • A study is to be carried out looking at issues on the M62 and M60 and along the A663(T) Broadway, Oldham.
  • A study into air quality issues on the M60 motorway is also to be carried out.
  • Performance of the network will be kept under review and both large and small scale works will be carried out where needed to tackle safety problems, deal with environmental issues, make journeys more reliable, and ensure that roads and structures are well maintained.

Funding Sources

Highways Agency funding

Targets and Objectives Met

These schemes will directly affect BV99 road safety, and an indirect effect on LTP2 traffic flows, LTP7 congestion, LTP8 and 9 air quality

       
       
       
       

 

Policy

Congestion Measures Summary

Summary of measures Greater Manchester local authority's and the GMPTE will adopt over  the next 5 years to reduce congestion:

  • Completing the Phase 1 and 2 Metrolink upgrade
  • Establishing with Governemnt a way of delivering all the Metrolink Phase 3 lines
  • Completing the Quality Bus Corridor Network
  • Implementing Statutory Quality Partnerships for all completed QBC schemes
  • Identifying further improvements to QBCs, including any additional routes
  • Developing schemes for off-road busways, complementing rail and Metrolink
  • Working with operators to establish express services on suitable corridors where this would complement the rail and Metrolink networks
  • Working with operators to improve reliability including a cashless fares system
  • Simplifying fares and introducing through ticketing
  • Improving school transport, including the use of Yellow School Buses, to help tackle the 'school run'
  • Assessing the potential of bus-based park and ride and implementing value for money proposals
  • Enhancing local rail facilities, including rail based park and ride and increasing peak period capacity
  • Promoting the development of school and workplace travel plans
  • Implementing a coach parking strategy for the Regional Centre
  • Keeping the number of taxi licences under review and further improving integration with public transport
  • Providing parking for powered two-wheelers and implementing measures to improve their safety
  • Increasing the price and reducing the provision, in the longer term, of long stay parking in town centres
  • Using planning policies to reduce the need to travel and ensure that new development is accessible by public transport
  • Work with public transport operators to improve integration between modes
  • Completing the Transport Innovation  Fund bid to fund the additional transport infrastructure and demand management measures necessary to tackle congestion.
  • Continued development of Traffic Managementmeasures designed to improve the efficiency of the network.

These measures will help us to achieve LTP2 targets BV102a-c ,104, LTP 2, 6a, 6b,  7 and 12a-c

 

Delivering Accessibility

Action taken to improve accessibility ensures that all residents of Greater Manchester – particularly those without access to a car or with mobility problems – can access those facilities which affect their life chances.  Better accessibility also leads to a stronger economy, better access to lifelong learning, a healthier lifestyle and a more inclusive society. Despite increasing trends towards working at home and accessing information and services electronically, transport remains a key factor in influencing accessibility.

For the purposes of the LTP programmes, the term ‘ accessibility’ covers both:

  1. The degree to which employment and amenities such as healthcare, education and shops can be accessed by the whole of the community, particularly those who are disadvantaged.

  2. The physical accessibility of public transport services and infrastructure for people with mobility problems.

Measures to improve access in the first, wider sense of the word, are an important part of our Bus Strategy, and are specifically addressed by our Accessibility Strategy

The Accessibility Strategy and its implementation during the LTP2 period.

In line with Guidance on Accessibility Planning, we have established Local Accessibility Partnerships and we shall be undertaking detailed local area studies throughout the LTP2 period. The studies will identify options under a value for money approach for the five-year programme. Measures identified through these studies will then be implemented by the various partners. A number of pilot studies were begun in 2005/06 to improve our understanding of the issues involved in accessibility planning, and we will be implementing measures arising from these. In order to ensure that a range of accessibility issues is tacked in all parts of Greater Manchester, we have developed a programme that involves action relating to each of the four sectors ( employment, education, health and food), and the four LTP segments (NW,NE,SE,SW) across the county.

A 5-year Action Plan has been prepared, which will be reviewed annually with partners to ensure its continued relevance. The Plan includes actions for implementation and studies to analyse access issues in more depth and propose cost effective solutions.

Where bus operators cannot commercially  meet  needs arising from these studies, we will use subsidy to provide a network of local services (including schools services) within walking distance of as many people as possible, linking to local centres or interchanges and to specific local facilities such as education, healthcare and employment.  These local services will include both conventional buses and demand responsive services, including shared taxis, and will in some instances be operated by Community transport organisations.

Taxis also contribute to the accessibility shared priority by reducing social exclusion for older people and people with mobility difficulties, and we want to ensure that taxi and PHV operators participate in the current GMPTE-funded Travel Voucher Scheme. GMPTE has commissioned research into the use of Travel Vouchers, aimed at improving the service to disabled people who cannot use public transport. Taxis will continue to be used to provide Demand Responsive Transport services in areas of low demand. We will encourage a higher proportion of taxis across Greater Manchester being made fully accessible to wheelchair users.

While better transport is one means of improving access, others may be more relevant depending on situation and timeframe.  Examples of alternative mechanisms include:

  • Better location of facilities
  • Changes in the method of service delivery: e.g. changes in appointment systems or mobile delivery of services.
  • Improved awareness among users of their options for access: for instance, clearer and more accessible public transport information.

 

GREATER MANCHESTER’S ACCESSIBILITY STRATEGY – KEY POINTS

Policy

  • Analysis suggests poor accessibility to Further Education in the rural areas on the eastern and northern fringes of Greater Manchester.
A specific study on access to FE and HE in Oldham and Rochdale will examine this in Year 1
  • The effects of local school re-organisation and the Schools White Paper are currently uncertain and are likely to be complex.  Further work will be required to understand these issues.
To be addressed by the Education Strategic Accessibility Partnership.
  • There is a major opportunity to improve access through cycling, particularly to secondary schools and FE/HE.
A pilot study will examine this in Oldham in Year 1.
  • There are significant issues about integration between operators and modes – for instance, cross-city journeys to access the Universities south of Manchester City Centre.
This will be addressed in the Integrated Travel cards study identified in Year 1
  • There are both significant concentrations of job opportunities and job seekers within Greater Manchester.  Where these overlap – for instance, Wythenshawe/Airport and central Manchester - better information and local re-organisation of bus routes may be required.
Will be addressed by the Manchester Airport Ground Transport Strategy, the Trafford Park / Salford Quays Access Study, the Skills Match Study and the Review of Information (all Year 1).  Further studies have been identified for later years.
  • In some cases (Central Oldham and Rochdale), there is significant unemployment that is remote from job opportunities.  Much better public transport access is needed, particularly into the regional centre.
Studies to examine access to Rochdale Business Park and access to employment from Oldham are included in Year 2.
  • Cross boundary collaboration is needed to examine how access to jobs outside the county be improved.
Will be addressed in a review of cross-boundary employment access issues relating to Liverpool, Omega (Warrington), Royal Ordnance (Leyland), Haydock Industrial Estate (St Helens) in Year 1.
  • Further work needs to be carried out to define access to fresh food, map sources of fresh food and identify local “food deserts”.
A study will examine these issues in Year 1.  In Year 2, partnerships will be developed to implement actions to improve fresh food in selected “food deserts”.
  • There will be a need to work with PCTs to ensure good access to GP facilities, ideally by new centres being situated close to frequent bus routes.
A study to examine access to community healthcare facilities will examine this in Year 2.
  • Hospital access is poor in certain parts of the county - for instance, the rural fringe of Oldham, outer East Manchester, a significant area east of Stockport and south of Ashton-under-Lyne, and parts of Bolton Bury and Wigan.

Actions from the Stepping Hill Pilot, work on the North East Sector Health Service reconfiguration and the Royal Oldham Hospital Accessibility Study (all Year 1) and further studies in subsequent years will address these issues.

Physical access to transport, and special needs transport

In order to improve physical access, we shall continue with the programmes introduced in LTP1 by investing in, for instance, ramps, tactiles, dropped kerbs, automatic doors and low-floor buses. Travel plans and other ‘ smarter choices’ techniques will be used to increase awareness of improvements in physical accessibility and to promote the more sustainable modes of travel, with a particular emphasis on short trips.

Following completion of our Integrated Social Needs Transport Best Value review we shall take further steps to integrate local authority education and social transport services alongside the Greater Manchester Ambulance Service, and Ring and Ride as well as over 15 Community Transport and other not-for-profit organisations . . This work follows completion of a Best Value review into integrated social needs transport provision.

Statement

Trafford Park Access Study

Trafford Centre

Introduction

Trafford Park and Salford Quays are located to the west of the Regional Centre, the latter being only 3.5km from the Centre. Historically, this was a huge employment area, with Trafford Park laying claim  to be the first industrial estate in  the country, and it was based on manufacturing industry and port activities. It followed the fortunes of these two sectors into decline, but even at its lowest point, it remained a major generator and attractor of journeys. Over recent years, Trafford MBC and Salford City Council  have played a major role in the regeneration of the area, and as a result it has developed vibrant new economic activities based around retail, logistics, commercial and leisure developments

Current Problems and Issues

Public transport has not reflected these changes in regeneration and economic development. The main problem perceived is that a lack of bus services causes problems of accessibility, which leads to difficulties in the recruitment, and retention of staff, particularly for shift and evening work.

Access to Trafford Park will be improved by the proposed Metrolink extension, but there are significant areas of deprivation which will not be served, and for which other solutions need to be found.

Proposed approach

A study has been commissioned jointly by GMPTE, Trafford MBC and Salford City Council to examine accessibility to employment opportunities in Trafford Park and Salford Quays.

The objectives of the study are:

  • to quantify the issues of employee recruitment and retention amongst businesses in the park and the Quays
  • to identify how much poor transport provision, poor awareness of transport options, poor working conditions and poor awareness of job opportunities contribute to the recruitment and retention issue
  • to identify where a lack of public transport provision is creating a barrier to people being able to access employment, retail and leisure opportunities,
  • to quantify and geographically locate these access issues,
  • to identify and evaluate a range of potential solutions (both transport and non-transport) in terms of costs, benefits, practicality and deliverability
  • to identify potential sources of funding for accessibility solutions
  • to determine a detailed action plan for addressing access to Salford Quays and Trafford Park with a timetable for implementation
  • to identify other measures which could contribute to the successful implementation of a transport strategy for the area.

Approach taken

A steering group has been formed between GMPTA/E, Trafford Council, Salford City Council and Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce to oversee the study, which is being undertaken by MVA Consultancy. The study is scheduled to report in late spring 2006.

Funding Sources

The initial study will be funded jointly by Trafford, Salford and GMPTE, using LTP mainstream funding. Future funding sources will depend on the outcome of the study.

Targets and Objectives Met

  • To establish a successful bus service(s) which are workable, and well supported by businesses.
  • To reduce unemployment around the periphery and in Trafford Park
  • To make Trafford Park and surrounding areas more accessible to employment.

This will contribute in particular to LTP2 targets BV102 bus patronage, BV104 bus satisfaction, LTP1 accessibility, and LTP2 area wide traffic

Statement

Upgrading signalised crossings: Tameside MBC

New pedestrian crossing, Tameside

Current Problems and Issues

Poor accessibility for both mobility and visually impaired people on the pedestrian routes to district and local centres, especially when using older signalised crossing installations which no longer meet the latest design standards.

Proposed approach

Systematic programme for the replacement of older crossings in order to provide signalised facilities which meet the latest BVPI 165 standards, which include dropped kerbs, tactile paving and audible and tactile signals as appropriate, in accordance with the latest design guidance. This will also be done for older crossings where other types of scheme which involve the upgrading of signal facilities, for example Quality Bus Corridor schemes, are taking place.

Funding Sources

£60k per year from the LTP Integrated Transport Block, supplemented by developer contributions where possible.

Targets and Objectives Met

This measure is reflected directly in indicator LTP10d, and is also expected to contribute to an increase in walking modal share to key centres LTP12b. This measure will help to meet BV165 targets. It is proposed that the BV165 target will increase from 87% in 2006/07 to 95.5% in 2010/11.

 

Policy

Accessibility Measures Summary

We intend to continue to use a toolkit of measures to improve accessibility across Greater Manchester, particularly for those who are dependent on public transport services for their mobility. To inform these solutions we have utilised the new Accession mapping software and intend to undertake further studies to identify the most effective measures in areas of identified need. Our strategy includes the following elements-:

  • New public transport services to be delivered to improve connections in those areas  where growth is expected, both in economic (employment) terms and at specific sites where for example, new housing and or education and health facilities will be built. 
  • Ensure access considerations, are given due weight in development control decisions particularly those which involve proposals  which will create significant travel demand.
  • Performance standards for network coverage as a whole and individual corridors will be agreed, and opportunities identified to pump-prime new services.
  • Improvements to the capacity and reliability of public transport, better walking and cycling links to the public transport network, therefore providing safe and efficient alternatives for those without access to a car.
  • A review of the criteria for supporting bus services, to ensure that subsidy is being used to best effect in relation to accessibility needs.
  • Travel planning initiatives to raise awareness of public transport options , improve travel information, and publicise the benefits on offer to both the environment and the individual of adopting “smarter” travel choices.
  • A range of initiatives to improve cross boundary accessibility in the more peripheral areas of the conurbation.
  • Our Concessionary Fares scheme will continue to offer a more generous range of concessions than that required by statute. The scheme is engineered to help reduce social exclusion amongst the over 60s and the disabled.
  • Following our Best Value Review, a range of actions to better integrate social needs transport provision are underway. This work is intended to deliver greater coordination between different service providers including cooperation between Ring and Ride and other social needs transport operators designed to improve overall efficiency.
  • We will continue to subsidise bus services to meet identified social needs not met by the commercial network and provide demand responsive transport in areas where conventional services cannot be provided economically.

Access for people with mobility problems will be improved through:

  • the design of new infrastructure,
  • provision of dropped kerb crossings,
  • provision of raised kerbs at bus stops,
  • physical access improvements at railway stations
  • provision of new vehicles for the Ring and Ride service
  • joint working with operators to increase further the number of low floor buses.
  • schemes to improve access for disabled people on walking journeys, such as at traffic signals and on footways

These measures will help us to achieve the targets LTP 1a and 1b regarding accessibility

 

Improving Transport Safety and Security

Our desired outcome is to reduce deaths and injuries, and to ensure that people feel safe on their journey. The road safety strategy has been developed in partnership with the Highways Agency and follows National Guidance.

In terms of options considered it is not an option to do nothing, therefore, we shall continue to analyse data and focus on locations where we can get the greatest returns. We will also continue to implement tried and trusted techniques which are proven to have a significant impact on safety and security.

We shall continue to identify and prioritise local safety schemes not only with the aim of maximising accident and casualty reduction in general but also with the more vulnerable road user in mind.  This will encourage greater cycling and pedestrian activity, particularly for shorter distance trips, in line with the main thrust of the LTP.  ‘ Safer Routes to School’ projects, including road safety education, training and publicity initiatives are continuing to be developed by Greater Manchester authorities. Our intention to install high quality cycle infrastructure will help to maintain the safety of users.

The Walking strategy seeks to support the reduction in road traffic accidents in terms of pedestrian casualties by promoting the use of Kerbcraft and other road safety education among younger children. The improvement in pedestrian areas and increase in the number of crossing points for pedestrians both controlled and non controlled as appropriate should also help to improve the casualty rates on Greater Manchester’s streets.

Our Bus Strategy identifies safety as a key concern for people who are considering using public transport. We therefore aim to tackle safety at all stages of the journey: through improving the quality of pedestrian routes (including lighting and provision of crossings), and passenger-friendly design of bus stations, CCTV coverage of stops and stations and real time information (which provides reassurance to passengers about their service). The Quality Bus Corridors include improvements to the pedestrian environment, particularly in local centres along the routes. GMPTE has developed  a safety and security strategy focusing on anti-social behaviour, criminal damage and perceptions of safety and is working in partnership with oper