Choice of Indicators
We have chosen our
- DfT advice on monitoring for LTP2, including the mandatory indicators and targets. In some cases we have come to an agreement
with DfT and GONW on the nature of some indicators, primarily where they vary slightly from the mandatory
DfT guidance . This is mostly to enable us to accommodate established monitoring techniques which would otherwise have caused a discontinuity in the data series, or involved substantial unnecessary additional or modified data collection systems. This has been the case with LTP1 Accessibility, LTP6 peak traffic to key centres and LTP7congestion . - The
shared priorities of congestion, air quality, accessibility androad safety - Other
Best Value indicators - Placing higher emphasis on ‘outcomes’ rather than ‘outputs’
- Revised LTP2 objectives and more detailed sub-strategies
- The existing LTP1 monitoring regime, continuing with useful indicators to establish trends over a longer period.
- The emergence of new monitoring techniques, such as using ITIS congestion monitoring data, and the use of Accession
accessibility modelling software - Issues considered to be of local importance, following
consultation with stakeholders - The need to have a practical and cost-effective monitoring programme
We shall be reporting progress against all the mandatory indicators specified by DfT. In addition we are including some additional Headline Indicators that relate closely to our LTP objectives. These are:
| LT9 |
|
| LTP10a | Accessible infrastructure (wheelchair accessible buses) |
| LTP10b | Accessible infrastructure (raised
|
| LTP10c | Accessible infrastructure (
|
| LTP10d | Accessible infrastructure (BV165 pedestrian crossings) |
| LTP10e | Accessible Infrastructure (BV178 ease of use of Public
|
| LTP11 | Walking: no. individual trips / year |
| LTP12a | Modal share to Regional Centre |
| LTP12b | Modal share to Key Centres |
| LTP12c | Vehicle trips / passenger to Manchester Airport |
